Publications

Variations in speech timing features have been reliably linked to symptoms of various health conditions, demonstrating clinical potential. However, replication challenges hinder their
translation; extracted speech features are susceptible to methodological variations in the recording and processing pipeline. Investigating this, we compared exemplar timing features extracted via three different techniques from recordings of healthy speech. Our results show that features extracted via an intensity-based method differ from those produced by forced alignment. Different extraction methods also led to differing estimates of within-speaker feature variability over time in an analysis of recordings repeated systematically over three sessions in one day (n=26) and in one week (n=28). Our findings highlight the importance of feature extraction in study design and interpretation, and the need for consistent, accurate extraction techniques for clinical research.

Speech is promising as an objective, convenient tool to monitor health remotely over time using mobile devices. Numerous paralinguistic features have been demonstrated to contain salient information related to an individual's health. However, mobile device specification and acoustic environments vary widely, risking the reliability of the extracted features. In an initial step towards quantifying these effects, we report the variability of 13 exemplar paralinguistic features commonly reported in the speech-health literature and extracted from the speech of 42 healthy volunteers recorded consecutively in rooms with low and high reverberation with one budget and two higher-end smartphones, and a condenser microphone. Our results show reverberation has a clear effect on several features, in particular voice quality markers. They point to new research directions investigating how best to record and process in-the-wild speech for reliable longitudinal health state assessment.