Publications

The impacts of supplemental adaptive intra-volume low-level scan (SAILS) and mid-volume rescan of low-level elevations (MRLE) usage on the Weather Surveillance Radar 1988-Doppler (WSR-88D) with respect to severe weather warning performance were evaluated. This is an update and expansion of an earlier study by Cho et al. (2022). Statistical methods applied to historical data from 2014–2022 yielded the following major results. Severe thunderstorm (SVR) warning performance metrics are shown in the figure below, where the vertical bars represent 95% confidence intervals and the numbers at the bottom correspond to the sample sizes. The results are divided according to the scanning option that is estimated to have been used at the time the decision to issue (or not issue) a warning was made. The first point to note is that probability of detection (POD), false alarm ratio (FAR), and mean lead time (MLT) improvements were associated with the usage of supplemental adaptive intra-volume low-level scan (SAILS or MRLE) in a statistically meaningful manner. As for the different sub-modes of SAILS, the multiple elevation scan option (MESO), i.e., SAILSx2 and SAILSx3, appeared to give more benefit than SAILSx1. However, the fact that the fastest base-scan update rates provided by SAILSx3 hardly yielded more benefit than SAILSx2 may indicate that the slowdown in volume scan update rates counteracted the more frequent base scans when going from SAILSx2 to SAILSx3. For POD and FAR, MRLE+4 significantly outperformed MESO-SAILS, which may also indicate that more frequent updates of elevations angle scans higher than the lowest tilt are needed by forecasters to make accurate SVR warning decisions.